Saturday, 18 September 2010


AS far as the Left is concerned, National-Anarchism is simply a form of generic fascism or, according to some of the more paranoid theories, a Right-wing conspiracy devoted to the subversion of the Left itself. Needless to say, this interpretation is incorrect and National-Anarchists are vigorously opposed to statism and reaction in all forms. At the same time, the 'national' component of the term National-Anarchism centres on the fact that some of us are racial separatists. Needless to say, whilst we wish to form Anarchist communities that are ethnically organic we also oppose negative and counter-productive attitudes that encourage racial hatred or mindless violence. Race-based politics have nearly always been the domain of Right-wing organisations. But the fact that National-Anarchists are prepared to address this thorny issue should not cause people to wrongly dismiss us as yet another Right-wing organisation committed to promoting 'white supremacy', because National-Anarchism itself transcends both Left and Right. We are not supremacist, racist, statist or totalitarian. In addition, the German National-Socialists and Italian Fascists of the twentieth century allied themselves with large banking interests and betrayed the more 'socialistic' aspects of their original programmes. We are genuine Anarchists and proud of the fact.

Right-wing organisations that recommend either a tightening of current immigration laws or advocate that people of non-European descent be repatriated to their countries of ethnic origin, inevitably try to play the system at its own game and therefore always come off second-best. The reason for this is simple. Not only do they become seduced and then corrupted by the parliamentary establishment and end up having to compromise in order to make electoral progress, they also reinforce the nonsensical realities of the modern nation-state by completely failing to understand the important difference between citizenship and ethnicity. As we mentioned in the Introduction, the 1789 French Revolution transformed a nation of monarchical subjects into citizens of a new republic, but aside from the fact that the jingoistic watchwords of 'liberty, equality and fraternity' were never put into practice, it did become possible for individuals to become part of the nation through citizenship alone, rather than it being a result of their French ethnicity. This subtle change has now smoothed the way for modern capitalists to bring in economic migrants from the Third World who, allegedly, are just as 'French', 'English' or 'German' as those of us with a blood-lineage stretching back thousands of years. The 'nations' of today, therefore, are completely false. By giving credence to these artificial entities, the Right actually reinforces the liberal-democratic myth. However, due to mass immigration and shifting demographics, the populations of contemporary Western 'nations' are changing all the time and therefore the establishment makes a determined effort to constantly redefine the whole concept of nationhood. For many people, the multi-racial populations of Europe and North America can no longer be regarded as 'nations' at all. People of non-European extraction may well be national citizens and hold a valid passport informing them that they have become 'naturalised', but, in reality, true nationhood is based on ethnic considerations. Names like 'England', 'France' and 'Germany' were once related to specific tribes and they were hardly Moorish, Bedouin or Zulu, so the fact that modern nation-states no longer reflect the ethnic identity of those original Indo-European tribes - or at least not entirely - makes the whole thing a total farce. Is northern Paris, with its large African population, still French? Are the Turks who have settled in Deutschland still German? Of course not.

For some National-Anarchists, Race defines who we are and provides us with an identity and exists for a damn good reason. Without maintaining this essential diversity, something you can find throughout nature, the world will become increasingly drab, standardised and monotonous. National-Anarchists wish to preserve the different races of the earth and believe that enforced multi-racialism ends with the dissolution of races themselves. For some of us, therefore, racial separatism is the only way that the organic balance can be restored. We realise that it is impossible to separate people in the large cities and towns, many of whom have racially-mixed children or wish to live among foreign populations, and neither should we attempt to do so. Indeed, we believe that the nation-states of the West are likely to collapse in the next few decades and that our respective countries will begin to fragment along racial and cultural lines. So there is clearly no need to treat people inhumanely by herding them into camps or deporting them in the way that the Nazis and Soviets did in the last century; something which ended disastrously for those concerned. National-Anarchists must form new communities based on their own values. The maxim of the future will be respect for others and unity in diversity.

Finally, it must be understood that the National-Anarchist Movement (N-AM) is not a racial separatist organisation per se and neither do we believe that it is essential for everyone to accept this principle. We adhere to the principle of 'live and let live' and, if people wish to establish multi-racial communities whilst retaining the 'National-Anarchist' label, then they should be permitted to do so. In other words, we believe that supporters of both mono-racialism and mixed tribal communities can work together for the wider promulgation of National-Anarchism in general. The most important thing of all, however, is for each of our communities to be established with a unifying vision; be it racial, cultural or spiritual. Separatism for some, mixed tribes for others.

Further reading:
Dr. John R. Baker, Race, Oxford University Press, 1976.
Émile Benveniste, Indo-European Language and Society, Faber and Faber, 1973.
Morton H. Fried, The Notion of Tribe, Cummings Publishing Company, 1975.
H.B. Isherwood, Racial Integration, Britons Publishing Co., 1966.
Jean Raspail, The Camp of the Saints, JR, 1973.
Douglas Reed, Nemesis? The Story of Otto Strasser, Jonathan Cape, 1940.
Douglas Reed, The Prisoner of Ottawa, Jonathan Cape, 1953.
Lothrop Stoddard, Racial Realities in Europe, Historical Review Press, 1981.
Otto Strasser, Hitler and I, Jonathan Cape, 1940.
Antony C. Sutton, Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, Bloomfield Books, 1976.
A.J. Barnard (Ed.), Hunter-gatherers in History, Archaeology and Anthropology, Berg, 2004.
Samuel Bowles & Herbert Gintis, A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution, Princeton University Press, 2011.
Hugh Brody, The Other Side Of Eden: Hunter-gatherers, Farmers and the Shaping of the World, North Point Press 2001.
Morton H. Fried, The Notion of Tribe, Cummings Publishing Company, 1975.
K. D. Morrison & L.L. Junker (Eds.), Forager-traders in South and Southeast Asia: Long-term Histories, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
C. Panter-Brick & R.H. Layton & P. Rowley-Conwy (Eds.), Hunter-gatherers: An Interdisciplinary Perspective, Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Bruce Parry, Tribe: Adventures in a Changing World, Penguin, 2007.
Colin Turnbull, The Forest People, Touchstone, 2007.


Related Articles of Interest: